Why he's a child and not a baby, don't ask me, but I don't think it makes much of a difference, and it might have been because of Innominat's influence anyway.ĭri eredeti hozzászólása:Reminder: Velvet doomed several villages knowingly. Malak!Laphicet was a totally blank slate so he's a child.
Seres was modeled after an adult and so was born that way. It's probably based on the personality of the malak or seraph. Eizen seems to imply he was born the way he is (as an adult) whereas Edna was a child. Some are born as children, some are already adults. As for how they are born and at what age, it could really just be arbitrary. Zaveid and Mikleo however both went through significant life changes which, over a timeskip, allowed them to age up. Edna, who hasn't really matured at all, is still a child, if a moody one. My personal theory is that a malak or seraph ages as they mature. In the first half of the game you burned a town, murdered several people, and (again) doomed several villages even though you knew what would happen if you freed the therions.Īs for how a malak or seraph ages, we don't know. She is very cold-blooded, I don't know how you missed that. Reminder: Velvet doomed several villages knowingly. They're more human than most daemons but still very clearly not good people. Velvet and Rokurou are missing a number of emotional traits, or have hot buttons that make them pretty unreasonable.
He was going to KILL A CHILD for trying to help him. He was willing to kill malak!Laphicet for interfering in his fight. Finally, consider this: Rokurou is not a good person. Rokurou and Velvet are very strong-willed, but Random Angry Villager isn't. He was consumed by a few emotions and turned into a hellion, but generally remained himself.ĭaemons work the same way. In fact I'd like to point out that Heldalf's circumstances are the same as Velvet's. Why do they have their reason? Zestiria told us explicitely that if a hellion is so in-sync with their true self, they retain their reason completely. But the end result is the same, that's all that matters.
Velvet did it more directly, Heldalf did it by spreading malevolence. Why are Velvet and Heldalf different? Logically, why would all Lords of Calamity be the same? All we know about what makes a Lord of Calamity is that it's a daemon/hellion so powerful they bring the world into chaos by their existence. Here the malak Laphicet is older in appearance but as a human he wasn't even born! Do we have to presume that is because of the influence of Innominat? We saw a similar thing in Zestiria with Mikleo and he maintained his age (in fact he grow up with Sorey). so why is she so different from Heldalf in her behavior?Ģ) We know that Laphicet (Phi) is the reincarnation of Velvet's niece but his "birth" is bothering me a lot. Plus: she is supposed to be the Lord of Calamity. Well, I can understand Velvet because she has a very particular situation but. They simply say all the time "yeah, I don't give a f*ck" or "I'll kill everyone" but their actions don't seem very daemon-like to me. Please, note that there are spoilers both from Berseria and Zestiria-ġ) I can understand that Velvet and Rokurou can maintain their reason (we have examples like Lady Maltran from Zestiria) but they never act like real evildoers or cold-blooded characters. My main doubt is that there are elements who clash with what we learned from Zestiria. I'm pretty close to the end of the story and I have a couple of questions that I don't think the game will deal with.
0 kommentar(er)
